Home

 

On the finca where I volunteered in Costa Rica, we spent five mornings a week working in the vegetable garden or tending to the coffee and banana plantation. Before the farm changed hands eighteen years earlier, the owners cultivated it with an industrial agricultural mix of pesticides and fertilizer now common around the globe. With those additions withdrawn, the plants struggled, but by rebuilding and inoculating the soil, the new owner eventually created a productive organic farm.

Work finished, we’d leave the organic plots and return to the volunteer house, where we’d wash the kitchen counters, clean the bathrooms, or mop the floors. To clean up after cockroach visitors, someone might spray the counters with Mr. Muscolo disinfectant—or use floor cleaner with a long warning in tiny print on the label.

septictank_300Surfaces doused in chemicals we couldn’t pronounce, we might cut fruit and lick our fingers, or wash nonbiodegradable dish soap down a PVC tube that took the waste into the soil or a creek running through the property. At home, I clean just about everything from floor to ceiling with white vinegar, but they didn’t sell that at the market in town. I rationalized leaving the finca’s established practices unquestioned by telling myself my stay was only temporary. I would go home to my own green cleaning practices before long, and I didn’t want to seem like a know-it-all.

I recalled the finca’s disconnect this past week when my permaculture design class watched The Story of Stuff (2007) by Berkeley activist Annie Leonard. She points out an obvious, yet unheeded fact: toxic chemical inputs result in toxic chemical outputs. For example, neurotoxic flame retardant additives remain in the finished products of our pillows, couches, and mattresses. Perhaps most alarming, human breast milk has one of the highest concentrations of toxic compounds given our position in the food chain.

After the film, the class had a lively discussion about the products and foods we do and do not buy, but one woman commented that there is no way to avoid toxins because we all drink water. Even purification filters contain silver-impregnated activated carbon and other additives that could possibly have health effects tantamount to the pollutants they’re designed to remove.

Our exposure to pollutants remains pervasive and insidious because when it comes to synthetic chemicals, rather than following a precautionary principle, the FDA applies a standard of innocent until proven guilty. Thus a generation of children drank from hard plastic Nalgene bottles and other containers until research demonstrated that a key ingredient in that plastic, bisphenol A (BPA), disrupts our endocrine systems. Now “BPA-free” plastic contains triphenyl phosphate (TPP), which may pose an even greater health risk. Still, because that risk hasn’t yet been demonstrated to the FDA’s satisfaction, today babies drink from sippy cups and bottles made with chemicals that could cause health problems for multiple generations. My classmate calls this the “cycle of regrettable substitutions.”

water+water_0At cafés in Costa Rica, I had to specify that I wanted tap water, or servers would bring that pinnacle of marketing miracles: an expensive plastic bottle of tap water shipped from somewhere else and billed as safer than tap water. (Does that sound repetitive and illogical? Oh, yeah.) I’ve seen various statistics about bottled water, but the production of one liter requires around three liters of water and one-third liter of fossil fuel, and Americans alone throw away tens of millions of plastic water bottles every day.

I found it disconcerting that a large amount of recyclable material in Costa Rica wound up incinerated, yet global plastic recycling options aren’t great either, as recycled plastic can’t return to its original form. Instead it “downcycles” into something like polar fleece or carpeting, and unprofitable plastics “recycled” in the U.S. often travel to the developing world’s incinerators, out of our sights and minds. A staggering amount becomes garbage in the marine food chain, our misconceptions about clean water resulting in the contamination of our oceans.

The permaculture class ended the week by hiking along Leona Creek in the Oakland hills, a large stretch of which runs underground and through unnaturally straight concrete culverts installed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The water in these culverts flows as a sickly trickle through thick algae, the result of fertilizer runoff from home gardens, places often more toxic than a typical agribusiness farm. In its more natural, unengineered form further downstream, the creek meanders through pools, over rocks, and along lush tree-shaded banks, all essential to a healthy riparian ecosystem. But it carries the same dissolved chemicals, wending their way toward the Bay.

Simply making personal choices to avoid toxins isn’t sufficient for the same reason that manufacturing with toxins isn’t wise: everything is connected. All of us live both up- and downstream from each other, up- and downstream from the consequences of our future and past decisions. Old-school pollution mitigation dictates that “the solution to pollution is dilution,” but individual bodies of water comprise one global body on our finite planet, and we all drink what any one of us adds to the mix.

It’s not enough to refrain from using pesiticides in our own yards but stand by while our neighbors douse theirs; to use our own reusable water bottles but remain silent when events distribute free disposable bottles; or to hold our tongues as we cook on chemical-covered counters because it feels uncomfortable to start a conversation. It’s time to speak up and become catalysts for a coordinated societal plan of action.

 
 

Action Resources

Beyond Pesticides
Did you know gardens are more diverse, more resilient, and easier to maintain when you attract pests’ predators rather than trying to eradicate the pests themselves? Honeybee colony collapse disorder has been directly linked to neonicotinoids in pesticides, and bees pollinate 70% of the top human food crops, supplying 90% of the world’s nutrition. This site includes activist resources for community organizing.

My Plastic-Free Life
Beth Terry is a living example of how to become more mindful about consumption, find plastic-free alternatives, save money, build community, and help the planet. Beth leads by example through her personal choices and also tirelessly organizes; one of her campaigns convinced Brita to make its filters recyclable via the Gimme 5 program.

Freecycle
The Freecycle Network is a worldwide movement to connect people in need of items with people trying to discard those items. Rather than putting a usable tool, DVD, baby accessory, article of clothing, or other item in a landfill while someone else buys a new version of the exact same thing (with all of the production waste and pollution that new manufacture entails), Freecycle helps connect people to make free exchanges.

Good Guide: Green, Healthy, & Safe Product Ratings
This project out of UC Berkeley uses scientific data to rate products based on health safety, environmental impact, and social responsibility. Take this one with a grain of salt; a lot of synthetic chemicals haven’t been tested—not containing anything proven dangerous doesn’t mean all ingredients have been proven safe.

Skin Deep
This database provides consumers information to avoid everyday exposure to toxic chemicals in cosmetics and personal care products.

 

 
 
 

Teresa K. Miller, 2014
* Photos taken from water.epa.gov and concordontap.org
* Thanks to my classmate Sam for her comment on water quality and regrettable substitutions, which inspired this post, as well as her suggestions of Good Guide and Skin Deep.

2 thoughts on “// it’s in the water

  1. ….” Houston, we’ve had a problem” !

    Well almost everybody knows this call ( Jack Swigert), it was long ago (April 1970), mission Apollo 13 was on the edge of getting lost in space.
    Back there I was little,sitting in front of a black&white Television,in Germany, speachless, nothing i could do only hoping, that this men could find a solution so far away in their spaceship and the men so far away in this control center in Huston/USA.
    This sentence, ever since ,followed me, in my entire lifetime when I run into a Problem.
    Sometimes you don’T even see the problem until it’s too late, sometimes you don’t even talk about the problem because it’s inappropriate or you feel it’s kind of uncomfortable, but still there is this problem. When we just avert, let it stay behind, some problems sooner or later, catch up and kick ass.
    Some of course will vanish in time and space, but still we might feel bad about having it not solved then.
    So what, if all our problems would be in a far away spaceship and we have to solve them right away or die. What if this would be our guideline in life, you can guess, if we would have a better world today.
    Now, Let’s talk about the little things we can do without saving the world imediately.
    The least one can do is SPEAK UP about a problem, thinking about a solution and offering it by speaking up. Lot’s of people today they practice criticism all the way and about everything and see all the problems of the world but, they do not offer one practicable solution. Talking and knowing is one side, pointing out how to doing it better, almost everybody is able to do it ,or find solutions in the world wide web, today.
    But to change it by yourself, maybe even to change yourself, that ist the most uncommon thing people do today. A change is always uncomfortable.

    If this Apollo crew would have sitten back in their spaceship and just left the problems to others , they shure would still fly in space and time and their story would be a total different one. But they did not, they solved it out there in space, together with the others, and made it back to earth, alive.

    Conclusion in this case, if you see in a organic farm the use of chemicals in a daily matter, than just speak up and offer a solution for this problem, everybody would have been happy about it.
    Long after you left the farm, there was a young man working with me for two months and we talked about those problems with contaminated water,from laundry, dish washing, floor cleaning etc. and together we solved the problem in almost one hour.
    We used components I already had produced, Lactic acid bacteria (production and usage :https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IG4M71vMbTs) and banana vinegar for organic cleaners here at the finca. Not only that I no further have to buy things, no, I produce such strong cleaners by myself -input zero money-output big relief and sathisfaction .
    On that matter I can say…..Huston, we solved the problem .

    So at least I am happy that you ,Teresa, had still thought about that matter, too bad not having talked about to us/me. Good news is, it’s done and now I have been builded a organic filter compound for all the waistwater at the finca, so any used water would never go unfiltered back into the lifecircle of the enviroment here or elsewhere.
    I stay open minded for any other change who is needed to be done for keeping things in a good shape for next generations, so just speak up for a change.

    Pura Vida
    Walter,
    Manager of Finca la Puebla, Rivas —-Costa Rica—-
    Interest to spend some time here or share knowledge ?
    mail me : schamannw@gmail.com

    • Pura vida, Walter! Thanks so much for reading & commenting. I’m glad to hear that a subsequent volunteer spoke up & the issue has been resolved. It’s a good reminder of the power of starting conversations in the right spirit. I hope your example radiates out from the finca.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s